Use a variety of resources - locate books , journals , and documents that contain useful information and ideas on your topic. Do not rely solely on electronic full-text material which is more easily available. Reference sources such as dictionaries can assist in defining terminology, and encyclopaedias may provide useful introductions to your topic by experts in the field and will list key references. See the chapter below for a helpful overview of the literature review process, especially the sections on how to analyse the literature you have gathered and how to write up your literature review:. Literature Reviews and Bibliographic Searches.
Psychosocial Interventions for Patients with Severe COPD-An Up-to-Date Literature Review
Write the Review - Systematic Reviews - LibGuides at University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Ready to start a systematic review? HSL Librarians can help! Fill out the Systematic Review Request Form and the best-suited librarian will get back to you promptly. It is an evidence-based minimum set of items for reporting in systematic reviews and meta-analyses. We have focused on randomized trials, but PRISMA can also be used as a basis for reporting systematic reviews of other types of research, particularly evaluations of interventions. PRISMA may also be useful for critical appraisal of published systematic reviews, although it is not a quality assessment instrument to gauge the quality of a systematic review. PRISMA is part of a broader effort, to improve the reporting of different types of health research, and in turn to improve the quality of research used in decision-making in healthcare.
Creating a PRISMA flow diagram
To achieve this, your literature review needs a well-thought-out structure. Deciding on the structure of your literature review should come towards the end of the literature review process — after you have collected and digested the literature, but before you start writing the chapter. In other words, you need to first develop a rich understanding of the literature before you even attempt to map out a structure.
Authors are recommended to use flow diagrams to present the review process, allowing for better understanding among readers. It composes four parts: Identification, Screening, Eligibility and Inclusion. Among them, 78 articles Our analysis showed high variation in the proportion of articles that reported flow diagram components. Therefore, this review suggests that the reporting quality of flow diagram is less satisfactory, hence not maximizing the potential benefit of the flow diagrams.